The web is dead?
Thursday, August 19, 2010 at 8:53AM 
A common theme has emerged over the past couple of months. This theme has been discussed by opinion leaders, business leaders, celebrities, more celebrities and, more importantly, Wired Magazine. The theme is the death of/dying World Wide Web. The premise is that mobile and tablet computers have increased the amount of applications ("apps") available to the consumers. Because these apps use a limited area of the Internet, it basically walls off the Internet for the purpose of creating a better user experience for the consumer. This is similar to the methods used by AOL, Compuserve and Prodigy in the early 90's. To extend the point because people are more likely to use apps, they would be less likely to use a traditional browser. Therefore, we are slowly moving towards the death of an "open web." Adding to this mix is the increase of content creators using paywalls as another method of increasing revenue. The paywall is just another barrier creating a closed web experience. The final point to add to the death of the web is gradual elimination of Flash from mobile/tablet browsing and the lack of a replacement WYSIWYG development platform. A good number of developers are/were training in the Flash development platform and it remains the simplest way of creating interactivity online. So with all of these points the question becomes, "is the open web dying?" The answer is yes and no. Here's why:
1.) We use "technologies of convenience."
The reasons that is seems that the open web is dying is because of where we use the Internet and how we connect online. When I just what to consume content, my tablet seems like the easy choice. However when I create content it's a different story. For me, the laptop and traditional desktop is how I create most of my content and access the Internet. I am currently typing this out on my laptop and it allows me to create this post relatively easily. This is made easier because I have access to a browser and can select which pages to access. In my view of the Internet, the Internet is a system of files and folders that allow for the simply point of connect between two/many people. Since I am sitting down in my house and writing this post out, I can easily put this file online and give everybody access to it who wants to read it. When I'm on the road, I can use my tablet to create the post. But I give up some of the benefits of having a full operating system, for example...
2.) Multitasking, multitasking, multitasking.
The reason that I'm writing this post and because I saw an email from Benton.org, which one of the story lead me to the Chris Anderson and Michael Wolff's debate on the reason that the Internet was dying. One the same screen, I can look back refer to the article and click a tab which allows me to continue to write this post. If I had a tablet/mobile computer, this process would be made harder.
3.) Creation vs consumption
Most of the promoters of the death of the open web are looking at it from the viewpoint that we go online to get our information, check in with our friends and maybe post a picture or video. If this was the case, the closed web would have won years ago. However, we like the ability to do create works from time to time and love have a way to share it with a larger community. The app based system of uploading content is relatively simple, which is the good and the bad point about the system. You can share content as it is in the real world, however it is moderately hard to edit it and add a creative mark to the content. An open web system gives access to online editors and content creation tools. The close system, for the most part, lacks these qualities.
4.) Not everybody has access to "app-based appliances."
What is typically forgotten about in these discussions is the concept of general access. I live in a relativity poorer area of the United States, in the Appalachian region. Because of this viewpoint, I don't see that many people interested in smart phones and tablet computing. Those who have wireless communication maybe interesting in texting, but nothing more than that. A majority of their computing experience and access to the outside world comes from using the library's computer or renting a netbook. Their only points of access comes from an open web system.
5.) The pendulum will allow swing back and forth.
Finally, it seems that technology and public policy swings back and forth from open to close system. This is why the government shuts down monopolies. This is also what spell the end of AOL and the other Internet service providers of the 90's. People realized there was an Internet outside of the one provided by the ISP and they wanted access to it. Now, the pendulum is swinging the other way. People are tired of the static and "porn" that is available online and wanted a safer environment with a better user experience. However, there will come a time when people are tired of the limited access their apps give them and the pendulum will swing again.
Based on these points, I would argue that the Internet is changing forms but the open web will still be around because there still will be a fundamental need for open access to information and communities.
Reader Comments (3)
Good points. Very clear theory, and i like the swinging pendulum idea ! the world wide web being a world wild web is its advantage (openness freedom) and its weakness (porn fraud unsafety) too.
Dies ist ein Artikel, der mich überzeugt. Die Offenheit des Webs ist seine große Strärke. Nur in diesem Umfeld können neue kreative Ideen wachsen.
Loyalty is the intimacy of the heart to reach north face jackets on sale the top after the advanced performance, and intimacy that anyone can improve what appears to be the trainer, after all, by the magic pet food professionals. It is as if dog can store, circus groups can also be dog trainer, dog training can be played on the skills, store energy and do more than others? Anyway, on the north face now know have the ability to hook people with the magic pet, in addition to a non-professional trainer outside "of all the remaining trainer, after all, not the players want to improve the intimacy trainer too difficult.